Letby did not murder babies, medical experts claim

Serial killer Lucy Letby did not murder any babies, the chairman of a panel of international medical experts has claimed while outlining "significant new evidence".

Letby, now 35, is serving 15 whole life prison sentences after being convicted of murdering seven babies and attempting to murder seven others.

The 14-strong panel attributed some of the deaths at the Countess of Chester's neonatal unit between June 2015 and June 2016 to natural causes, and alleged others were due to substandard care.

The study is now likely to form the heart of submissions to the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC) after Letby's lawyers applied for her case to be investigated as a potential miscarriage of justice.

Former neonatal nurse Letby lost two bids to challenge her convictions at the Court of Appeal last year.

Veteran MP Sir David Davis, who has been assisting Letby's legal team, described her convictions as "one of the major injustices of modern times".

The panel, including experts from Canada, the U.S, Japan, Germany, Sweden and the UK, looked at 17 cases at the heart of Letby's prosecution.

In a lengthy and medically technical press conference, chair of the panel Dr Shoo Lee, a Canadian neonatal care expert, said there were alternative explanations for each of Letby's convictions for murder or attempted murder.

Dr Lee said he became involved in the case after learning that an academic paper he co-authored on air embolism, one of the methods Letby was said to have used to attack babies, formed part of the prosecution case in her trial.

He said the 14 experts, had compiled an "impartial evidence-based report".

The report presented at the conference was a summary of the panel's findings, and the full report would be submitted to Letby's legal team Dr Lee said.

Dr Lee provided what he said were highly detailed grounds baby-by-baby for concluding that none of the murders occurred.

He added: "We did not find any murders. In all cases, death or injury were due to natural causes or just bad medical care."

"Lucy was charged with seven murders and seven attempted murders", he said.

"In our opinion, the medical opinion, the medical evidence doesn't support murder in any of these babies.

"Our full report will go to Lucy's barrister later this month, and then it'll be up to him and the courts to decide what next to do."

In Letby's trial the prosecution referred the to 1989 paper by Dr Lee that looked at cases of air embolus, referring to injuries caused when air is injected into a baby's arteries or veins.

In the cases Dr Lee analysed in his paper, the injuries had happened accidentally.

The prosecution argued that one of the methods Letby used to injure or kill babies was to inject air into their veins and used Dr Lee's paper to back that claim.

In the paper Dr Lee described a distinct discoloration on the babies' skin in 10% of cases.

However, at the press conference he said in all of those cases air was injected into the babies' arteries, not their veins.

He said that the skin discolouration described in the paper is not possible when air is injected into the veins.

Dr Lee prefaced his remarks by saying that the thoughts of each panel member were with the families of the babies who had died.

The prosecution's medical case was scrutinised by the Court of Appeal in May last year and found to be safe - and the judges noted Letby herself did not present any experts at her trial offering an alternative view.

Dr Lee gave evidence to the Court of Appeal as part of Letby's application for leave to appeal, but three senior judges said his conclusions did not leave the convictions unsafe.

The judges concluded there had been no prosecution expert evidence diagnosing air embolus solely on the basis of skin discolouration.

Earlier, the CCRC said Letby's lawyers had applied to the commission to investigate her case as a potential miscarriage of justice.

The body said it would now assess the application and determine whether there was new evidence which presented a reasonable chance of a conviction being overturned.

A CCRC spokesperson said: "We are aware that there has been a great deal of speculation and commentary surrounding Lucy Letby's case, much of it from parties with only a partial view of the evidence.

"We ask that everyone remembers the families affected by events at the Countess of Chester Hospital between June 2015 and June 2016."

Mark McDonald, Lucy Letby's barrister, said that because her previous legal team had not called a medical expert at her trial, the information presented was "new, fresh evidence".

He said the nurse was convicted because of the medical evidence, and if that was wrong any circumstantial evidence would "fall away".

"The most important thing, the reason why Lucy Letby was convicted, was because of the medical evidence that was presented to the jury that today has been demolished," he said.